Monday, October 14, 2013

Part - II - Best Comments over Shut Down..!

As the government shut down this week, the political echo chamber certainly did not. Here are some of the best quotes about the shutdown.

“I really think Boehner needs to get some courage. Maybe he needs to take an afternoon off and golf and contemplate it and come back.”

— Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.), on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe”.

“As an old army guy and an FBI agent, the last place you want to be fighting a fight is on the enemy’s territory where they know it best. You want to get them in a place where you dominate the playing field, and we’re just not, and that’s what worries me.”

— Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.), on “The Mike Huckabee Show”.

“I am not a criminal. I am not a scoundrel. So they better get a different definition of me.”

— Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), on the Senate floor.

“I think if you’re the White House, you just sit back and watch.”

—Former press secretary Robert Gibbs, on MSNBC’s “Now with Alex Wagner”.

“My approach would be, as the executive, is to call in the leaders of the Congress, the legislature, whatever you’re dealing with and say that we’re not leaving this room until we fix this problem. Because I’m the boss, I’m in charge.”

— New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, at a Jon Bon Jovi Soul Foundation event.

More on Next Update..
Source : http://www.politico.com/gallery/2013/10/shutdown-25-great-quotes/001338-019087.html

Best Comments over Shut Down..!

As the government shut down this week, the political echo chamber certainly did not. Here are some of the best quotes about the shutdown.

Senate Chaplain Barry Black
Senate Chaplain Barry Black
“Save us from the madness. Deliver us from the hypocrisy of attempting to sound reasonable while being unreasonable. Remove the burdens of those who are the collateral damage of this government shutdown, transforming negatives into positives.”
— Senate Chaplain Barry Black, opening prayer on the Senate floor.
“We’re not going to be disrespected, We have to get something out of this. And I don’t know what that even is.”
— Rep. Marlin Stutzman (R-Ind.), the Washington Examiner, Oct. 2 (Stutzman issued a statement the following day, saying, “Yesterday, I carelessly misrepresented the ongoing budget debate and Speaker Boehner’s work on behalf of the American people. Despite my remarks it’s clear that the American people want both parties to come to the table to reopen the government, tackle this nation’s debt crisis, and stop ObamaCare’s pain.”)
 “So when you were on the jihad against Americans’ access to health care, shutting down the parks wasn’t a problem. Shutting down NIH wasn’t a problem.”

— Rep. George Miller (D-Calif.), on the House floor.



 “As a citizen, I have to say that this is a pretty ugly sight.’”

— Former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, on “CBS This Morning”.



“This is much more like what I deal with Henry in the morning when he says he wants to say, ‘I want candy for breakfast.’ It’s really a tantrum; it’s a tea party tantrum. ‘You either give me my way, or we’re going to shut down government.’”

— Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe”.


More on Next Update..

Source : http://www.politico.com/gallery/2013/10/shutdown-25-great-quotes/001338-019087.html

Senate leaders nearing a deal..!


Senate leaders are closing in on a deal to reopen the government and extend the U.S. debt ceiling until next year, marking a major breakthrough in an impasse that has paralyzed Washington for the last two weeks, according to several sources familiar with the talks.

In a furious round of last-ditch negotiations, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell were discussing a proposal to reopen the government until Jan. 15 and raise the national debt limit until Feb. 15. Several people familiar with the matter expected that a deal could be announced Monday, though its prospects in the GOP-led House are far from certain.

After meeting twice Monday, Reid and McConnell both were hopeful a deal would reached.

”I’m very optimistic that we will reach an agreement that’s reasonable in nature this week to reopen the government, pay the nation’s bills and begin long term negotiations to put our country on sound fiscal footing,” Reid said on the floor.
McConnell said he was also optimistic that “we’re going to get a result that will be acceptable to both sides.”
In a sign a deal was taking shape, President Barack Obama delayed a Monday meeting at the White House with the congressional leaders to give Reid and McConnell more time to finalize an accord. A Senate Republican source said Republicans are likely to hold a party caucus to go over the negotiations sometime this afternoon or evening.

The plan under consideration would require larger bicameral budget negotiations to conclude by Dec. 15, sources said. Moreover, Senate Democrats are open to a requirement that those receiving Obamacare subsidies be subject to income verification. But it appears that the fight over delaying Obamacare’s medical device tax is still a point of contention with Democrats objecting to its inclusion in the package, sources said.

If sequestration were to continue in 2014, the proposal would give federal agencies more discretion to implement the across-the-board cuts.
Under the plan, the government would be funded at $986 billion until Jan. 15, the same day that a $21 billion across-the-board sequestration cut is slated to take place. Indeed, by aligning the government funding fight with the date that the next sequester is supposed to hit, it all but ensures a heated fight over whether to continue the unpopular cuts in the new year. Doing so would lower 2014 funding levels to $967 billion, a level far too low for many Democrats.

And by extending the debt ceiling until the beginning of next year, it would put the issue in the center of the heated 2014 midterm elections.

McConnell reviewed the offer Monday as he privately huddled with groups of GOP senators Monday who could be key to providing enough votes in the Senate. On Monday morning, McConnell met with Sens. John McCain of Arizona, Susan Collins of Maine, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Mike Johanns of Nebraska and Mark Kirk of Illinois.

“We’re engaged in good-faith negotiations,” said Don Stewart, McConnell’s spokesman. “Those talks will continue.”

House Republican leadership has been inclose touch with McConnell throughout his negotiations with Reid, but there was growing concern that a six-to-nine month debt ceiling would not be good enough for the House GOP. This proposal would be easier for Boehner - but aides say he still could amend it.

Source : http://www.politico.com/story/2013/10/government-shutdown-debt-ceiling-default-update-98260.html

Friday, October 11, 2013

Google's Going to Start Sticking Your Face and Name in Ads..!



This was bound to happen. Following Facebook's highly controversial attempts to make social endorsements ubiquitous on the site, Google just announced a Terms of Service update that will enable the company to use your name, photo and endorsements in Google's advertising network.
So how does that make you feel? Google obviously wants you to feel okay about the changes. The company assured users in its announcement blog post, "On Google, you're in control of what you share." (Emphasis Google's) And that's technically true. You can opt out of the face-flaunting new feature through this settings page in Google+, but if you don't do anything, Google says it will use your information without explicit consent.
Ugh. Doing anything from leaving a YouTube comment to starring something in Google Play to giving it the +1 treatment will cause your face to show up on ads. (Users under 18, however, will not appear in ads.) Google is also somewhat vague about who will see your face: "So your friends, family and others may see your Profile name and photo, and content like the reviews you share or the ads you +1'd." Facebook, however, is less vague: "If you have selected a specific audience for your content or information, we will respect your choice when we use it."
Although the new changes don't sound awesome, Google's learned from Facebook's mistakes in a way. Facebook similarly uses your likeness in so-called Sponsored Stories, however you can't opt out. When Facebook started doing this, users freaked out and said that Facebook hadn't properly notified them about how the social network was using their endorsements. And when we say "freaked out," we mean "filed a class action lawsuit"-which they won-prompting Facebook to change the site's privacy policy. The FTC has since opened an investigation into the matter.
Obviously, Google wants to avoid the shitstorm that Facebook has endured, so they're trying to be better communicators. That doesn't detract from the fact that the search giant is going to start slinging your face and name all over the internet without your explicit consent. You'll be notified with some banner ads on Google's homepage before the new Terms of Service goes into effect on November 1. But it's up to you-and only you-to opt out if you don't like that.
Source : http://www.gizmodo.in/software/Googles-Going-to-Start-Sticking-Your-Face-and-Name-in-Ads/articleshow/23987477.cms

Following Its Revamp, Yahoo Email Forwarding Bug Leaves Users’ Inboxes Empty..!

yahoo-empty-inbox



Yahoo Mail has been experiencing a major bug, following its revamp earlier this week. According to a number of reports, the service has been automatically forwarding emails to users’ “alternate,” external email addresses – a setting that was switched on without users’ permission. Yahoo has replied to some help requests via its Twitter account @YahooCare, but it hasn’t replied to help requests on its UserVoice forum, nor has its Customer Care site offered a solution to this problem.
We’ve also reached out to the company for information on this and will update if/when we hear back.
Some of the affected users have contacted TechCrunch tips and staff about the problem. It seems the bug has been in the wild for some time. Yahoo’s Mail upgrade took place on Tuesday, Oct. 8, when it introduced 1 TB of storage, “Mail Plus” features, and more. Complaints began showing up shortly after.
In Yahoo Mail, as in many other webmail providers, users had previously been able to configure a secondary address, which could also be used to send their Yahoo Mail elsewhere through an auto-forwarding option, which could be switched off or on. But after the Mail upgrade this week, that auto-forwarding option was set to “on” for some users, even though they had not switched it on themselves.
The result was that users were not getting their emails at all, not realizing that they were being sent to an alternate inbox.
As one tipster lamented to TechCrunch, “Yahoo support wasn’t any help, and after a couple of days I finally figured out that all incoming email was being forwarded to an old Hotmail address that I haven’t used in nearly 15 years. Making the situation even worse, it appears that the Hotmail address was recycled and is now being used by someone else, which is potentially a huge privacy/identity theft issue,” they said. (Security issues around recycled email addresses was another complaint Yahoo recently had to overcome itself).
Another complaint on Yahoo’s UserVoice site reads:
“Auto-forwarding was turned on for my account without my request or action. For over a day, my mail was being forwarded to a DEAD corporate account to a company that I have not worked for over 3.5 years!! This resulted in valuable lost mail.”
Meanwhile, others say they couldn’t get help through Customer Care, and one person even writesthat while trying to submit “Feedback,” that page wasn’t working either, leading to error messages. Similar complaints are found on Twitter, too, with some @YahooCare responses asking users to check to see if they could switch the setting off.
The account then tweeted this morning in response to one user that, after checking with the Mail team, their issue — which appears to be related to auto-forwarding — was fixed. But the account isstill responding to these kinds of requests, so it’s unclear if that’s the case for all.
This could be a problem for Yahoo’s attempts at revamping its image. The massive amount of storage Yahoo Mail now offers is tempting for new or relocating email users who may be considering between top webmail services like Gmail, Microsoft’s Outlook.com, and Yahoo, for example. But while no service is immune from issues (Gmail experienced lengthy email delays last month), anything less than a smooth transition from “old” Yahoo Mail to “new” Yahoo Mail could keep users from placing their trust in the company’s infrastructure for something as mission-critical as email.
Really, though, the larger problem here is not that the auto-forwarding was happening (though that’s bad, bugs do happen), but that Yahoo hasn’t publicly addressed the issue (unless you count Twitter support), nor did it reply to those complaining of problems on the forums and through other channels, from what we’re hearing. There’s no reason a rep couldn’t quickly reply on UserVoice at the very least, saying “we’re looking into this now,” or the Mail blog couldn’t post a short message, even if Yahoo doesn’t have a fancy “app status” dashboard like Google.
Without an official comment from Yahoo, we can’t confirm how widespread the issue is or where we are in terms of a fix. This could be a minor issue affecting a small percentage of users, or it could be larger.
Source : http://techcrunch.com/2013/10/11/following-its-revamp-yahoo-email-forwarding-bug-leaves-users-inboxes-empty/